A disastrous economic management that has ruined the town.
As much as attempts to mislead the electorate with unrealistic data, the fact is that if economic management socialist years ago was not all good, it resulted in an improvement in infrastructure, entertainment and services for the municipality.
the past 8 years, economic management has deteriorated significantly, as much as we want to sell otherwise. The debt has grown and investment have been reduced to a minimum without forgetting the services, whose quality in many cases has fallen. Better not to mention the entertainment.
DC The program for this election are proud of their economic management to achieve in the last financial year a surplus of 180,000 euros, forgetting their large deficits result of efforts pathetic. So these were the CC data in this sense data to be bypassed, placing them only in 2010 (positive), a year where the council saved a lot of money to stop investment, subsidies and grants restricted to clubs, associations, students, limit festivities (eg tent) , etc. Budget Deficit Year
As much as attempts to mislead the electorate with unrealistic data, the fact is that if economic management socialist years ago was not all good, it resulted in an improvement in infrastructure, entertainment and services for the municipality.
the past 8 years, economic management has deteriorated significantly, as much as we want to sell otherwise. The debt has grown and investment have been reduced to a minimum without forgetting the services, whose quality in many cases has fallen. Better not to mention the entertainment.
DC The program for this election are proud of their economic management to achieve in the last financial year a surplus of 180,000 euros, forgetting their large deficits result of efforts pathetic. So these were the CC data in this sense data to be bypassed, placing them only in 2010 (positive), a year where the council saved a lot of money to stop investment, subsidies and grants restricted to clubs, associations, students, limit festivities (eg tent) , etc. Budget Deficit Year
2003 885.460 2004 1.195.471 2005 1.217.607
2006 862.883 2007 979.051 2008 992.090
These data have been overlooked by CC for pure interest. This information is in the municipal budgets.
His disastrous economic management does not stop there. We have become one of the largest municipalities debt, bank speaking, the Canaries (http://canarias24horas.com/images/stories/2009/04abr/deuda_aytos_canarias_2008.pdf) with more than 653 euros per capita debt.
total debt acknowledged by the local council of the corporation has increased significantly from the 2.4 million euros in 2002 to 4.8 million in 2004 to be encrypted at 31 December 2008 5,361,362 euros. At December 31, 2009, amounts to € 5,057,005.44. This information has been published in the press in recent years. In what is certain is that according to the Ministry of Finance the city of San Andrés y Sauces had a debt to 31/12/2009 of € 3,190,000, the 53.47% of the municipal budget. Debt outstanding was 2,366,000 as of 31/12/2008 so in one year the debt grew at € 824,000. Is that good economic management?
These data support the decline as something logical that municipal investments but hit the payroll cost of the government group has risen from just over 37,000 euros in January 2003 to over € 177,000 in July 2007, provided from the 115,000 per year since 2004 (€ 124,000 in 2010).
This is the real economic management of CC. Not to mention bad management that have cost us much money as the host of unfair dismissal made in these years.
And is that economic management in recent years DC has long been the worst in the history of San Andrés y Sauces
0 comments:
Post a Comment