Basilio Perez says goodbye with a heavy coat of varnish on the management of CC.
Basilio Pérez complaint, which might be his farewell, "San Andrés y Sauces irrevocably lost population to the neglect of the council, which does nothing to alleviate the bleeding continues migration that leads to an acceleration aging "Remember that is the only municipality in the Canary Islands to lower the number of councilors from May.
The PSC-PSOE spokesman in San Andrés y Sauces, José Basilio Pérez, complains that the municipality is currently has the worst population data from 1920, "because since then the number of troops does not fall population of 5,000, reaching 4,874 at present, according to the latest population census (2010)."
Perez claims that " year after year the number of people who are written off in the registry is increasingly important, exceeding the period 2004 -2009 for the first time the 160 people a year ." Regrets
socialist spokesman when discussing the fate of these migrant willow, according to data provided by the Canary Institute of Statistics, almost 40% leaves another municipality of La Palma , similar to migrating to other islands. Therefore Perez is convinced that "something is happening so that l @ s @ s saucer decide to change a municipality by another within an island of such small dimensions."
To José Basilio Pérez "the null future development proposals raised by CC and the limited range of leisure are the cause of this slow but steady migration to the town experienced in recent years, which coincides exactly with the period of government CC willow in front of the consistory. It also states that "quite a number of registered voters living abroad and have not been given Low emotional reasons "so that the figure" is certainly even lower. "
The truth is that numbers of the Canary Institute of Statistics in hand, in 2002, just before the entrance to the DC local government, the municipality had 5226 inhabitants and January 1, 2010 and 4874 when there were only vegetative growth per year is slightly negative but as a lot of this population loss is clearly due to emigration. "More than 350 people is quite important because a loss is 7% of the population in just eight years," laments José Basilio, who argues that "it is the second city of the Canary Islands to more people lost in this period, indicating that things are going well. "
The big problem is the socialist spokesman said that "this situation will influence the future of the municipality, as the emigration of young people is causing the slow birth and accelerates the aging population." According to Perez the problem is that there is generational change since the immigrant population is in large part, which should be fertilized in the town and provide young people a future. In addition this theoretical approach is shown as an irrefutable reality in the municipality to have San Andrés y Sauces "with more people in the group aged between 80-84 years to between 0-4 and 5-9 years. " Situations like this bring the city to be among the oldest populations in the Canary Islands-eighth in 2007 - and third in the Island with an average age of the population over 45 years and a ratio of over 65 years, above 23 % of total population, which will worsen in the future because "once you start these dynamics, it is very difficult to reverse them in the short and medium term." Pérez
reaffirms its approach to award CC much of the blame for this depopulation due to "ineffective in municipal management demonstrated in the perpetuation of the adoption of PGO In 2003 he was ready for approval, the inability to generate employment dynamics, the neglect of civic participation projects such as Local Agenda 21 or the increasingly non-existent municipal leisure facilities for young people. " Likewise remember that in almost 8 years in office, CC has not brought forward its election promises and has been limited to complete projects of the previous socialist government, arguing that "the only new buildings are those of the Plan E and Port Beach Espindola, acting also on the central government and whose approval is due to the socialist efforts in the late 90's and early this decade. " In short notes that "the inefficiency DC is plunging the town. "
For Perez, the only way out is "the implementation of a strategy of local development, valuing the local potential, generate positive economic inertia and improve living standards, especially the younger sector of the population", but argues that not think that will happen with CC on the front because he has shown a lack of any development strategy in recent years.
To all this must be added, Basilio Perez emphasizes that for these local elections on May 22 we are below the threshold of 5001 inhabitants, which means reducing the number of councilors to 11 and will be depleted of other government transfers, which could further aggravate the current economic situation in the City, which will affect directly and proportionately to the municipality.
The PSC-PSOE spokesman in San Andrés y Sauces, José Basilio Pérez, complains that the municipality is currently has the worst population data from 1920, "because since then the number of troops does not fall population of 5,000, reaching 4,874 at present, according to the latest population census (2010)."
Perez claims that " year after year the number of people who are written off in the registry is increasingly important, exceeding the period 2004 -2009 for the first time the 160 people a year ." Regrets
socialist spokesman when discussing the fate of these migrant willow, according to data provided by the Canary Institute of Statistics, almost 40% leaves another municipality of La Palma , similar to migrating to other islands. Therefore Perez is convinced that "something is happening so that l @ s @ s saucer decide to change a municipality by another within an island of such small dimensions."
To José Basilio Pérez "the null future development proposals raised by CC and the limited range of leisure are the cause of this slow but steady migration to the town experienced in recent years, which coincides exactly with the period of government CC willow in front of the consistory. It also states that "quite a number of registered voters living abroad and have not been given Low emotional reasons "so that the figure" is certainly even lower. "
The truth is that numbers of the Canary Institute of Statistics in hand, in 2002, just before the entrance to the DC local government, the municipality had 5226 inhabitants and January 1, 2010 and 4874 when there were only vegetative growth per year is slightly negative but as a lot of this population loss is clearly due to emigration. "More than 350 people is quite important because a loss is 7% of the population in just eight years," laments José Basilio, who argues that "it is the second city of the Canary Islands to more people lost in this period, indicating that things are going well. "
The big problem is the socialist spokesman said that "this situation will influence the future of the municipality, as the emigration of young people is causing the slow birth and accelerates the aging population." According to Perez the problem is that there is generational change since the immigrant population is in large part, which should be fertilized in the town and provide young people a future. In addition this theoretical approach is shown as an irrefutable reality in the municipality to have San Andrés y Sauces "with more people in the group aged between 80-84 years to between 0-4 and 5-9 years. " Situations like this bring the city to be among the oldest populations in the Canary Islands-eighth in 2007 - and third in the Island with an average age of the population over 45 years and a ratio of over 65 years, above 23 % of total population, which will worsen in the future because "once you start these dynamics, it is very difficult to reverse them in the short and medium term." Pérez
reaffirms its approach to award CC much of the blame for this depopulation due to "ineffective in municipal management demonstrated in the perpetuation of the adoption of PGO In 2003 he was ready for approval, the inability to generate employment dynamics, the neglect of civic participation projects such as Local Agenda 21 or the increasingly non-existent municipal leisure facilities for young people. " Likewise remember that in almost 8 years in office, CC has not brought forward its election promises and has been limited to complete projects of the previous socialist government, arguing that "the only new buildings are those of the Plan E and Port Beach Espindola, acting also on the central government and whose approval is due to the socialist efforts in the late 90's and early this decade. " In short notes that "the inefficiency DC is plunging the town. "
For Perez, the only way out is "the implementation of a strategy of local development, valuing the local potential, generate positive economic inertia and improve living standards, especially the younger sector of the population", but argues that not think that will happen with CC on the front because he has shown a lack of any development strategy in recent years.
To all this must be added, Basilio Perez emphasizes that for these local elections on May 22 we are below the threshold of 5001 inhabitants, which means reducing the number of councilors to 11 and will be depleted of other government transfers, which could further aggravate the current economic situation in the City, which will affect directly and proportionately to the municipality.
